<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Zinged by Jim Boykin, I think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/09/29/link-zinged-by-jim-boykin-i-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/09/29/link-zinged-by-jim-boykin-i-think/</link>
	<description>Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/09/29/link-zinged-by-jim-boykin-i-think/comment-page-1/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1652#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>I think it is common knowledge these days that the people who blatantly come out to say that they are not buying links are the biggest buyers out there.  They just want to try to clear the air with their current clients to make them feel more at ease and/or to get on the &quot;white list&quot; of Google for any previous wrong doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is common knowledge these days that the people who blatantly come out to say that they are not buying links are the biggest buyers out there.  They just want to try to clear the air with their current clients to make them feel more at ease and/or to get on the &#8220;white list&#8221; of Google for any previous wrong doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean@Enhance</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/09/29/link-zinged-by-jim-boykin-i-think/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean@Enhance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1652#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Excellent article Michael, 

It&#039;s understandable that companies and businesses are looking to build links &lt;i&gt;but&lt;i&gt; there is a way of going about it which some people don&#039;t seem to care about. 

It doesn&#039;t take a huge amount of effort to do some &lt;b&gt;research&lt;b&gt; before asking for a link but I suppose that some people are more bothered about sending x amount of emails than actually working out how to get a link.

The resource from Eric and yourselves on how to contact a webmaster should be read by every SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article Michael, </p>
<p>It&#8217;s understandable that companies and businesses are looking to build links <i>but</i><i> there is a way of going about it which some people don&#8217;t seem to care about. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t take a huge amount of effort to do some <b>research</b><b> before asking for a link but I suppose that some people are more bothered about sending x amount of emails than actually working out how to get a link.</p>
<p>The resource from Eric and yourselves on how to contact a webmaster should be read by every SEO.</b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Just Say ON</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/09/29/link-zinged-by-jim-boykin-i-think/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Just Say ON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1652#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>I feel you on this one.  Spamming with link requests / business pitches via the contact web form is extra greasy (and yet I see it with alarming frequency).

And they actually expect someone to say yes?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel you on this one.  Spamming with link requests / business pitches via the contact web form is extra greasy (and yet I see it with alarming frequency).</p>
<p>And they actually expect someone to say yes?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
