Comments on: Why TruReputation Score measures sentiment http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/06/15/why-trureputation-score-measures-sentiment/ Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc. Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:35 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: SEO Ranter http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/06/15/why-trureputation-score-measures-sentiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1603 SEO Ranter Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:54:32 +0000 http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1581#comment-1603 It's interesting to see how sentiment analysis has begun to merge with SEO. More and more outfits are really getting in to massive-scale sentiment analysis to manage brand reputation, and so this previously-stagnant field is getting another kick. I like how you've merged the two. There's still some implicit work that can be done on click behaviour from log traces on the side of the search result provider, but that's a completely different feature representing something else. It’s interesting to see how sentiment analysis has begun to merge with SEO. More and more outfits are really getting in to massive-scale sentiment analysis to manage brand reputation, and so this previously-stagnant field is getting another kick. I like how you’ve merged the two. There’s still some implicit work that can be done on click behaviour from log traces on the side of the search result provider, but that’s a completely different feature representing something else.

]]> By: Michael Martinez http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/06/15/why-trureputation-score-measures-sentiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1601 Michael Martinez Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:13:14 +0000 http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1581#comment-1601 Not sure how that comment got approved. Thanks for bringing to my attention. I've removed it from the blog and reported the spammer. <strong>olmei</strong>: "So the real deal is, while expressing your beliefs about what sentiment is NOT… including traditional seo practices like links [cough... wheeze], you seem conveniently as vague as ever, this time round about distinctions within SM Monitoring, as what it IS - MADE of. We need some theoretical metrics we can use as a base line though Michael. So while I don’t want your algo, if you were 20 years younger and just starting within the online marketing profession, would your experience make you gravitate toward tweeting a bit more, or continue via on-page, including the inevitable Google manipulation we must all CONFORM to?" <strong>Michael</strong>: I'm not sure I follow you. Sentiment has nothing to do with where you express your opinion, so were I 20 years younger today I would probably be no more inclined to tweet than I am now. I can praise you or call you a slug through a blog post just as easily as through a tweet (but given how wordy I am, I need a full blog). <strong>olmei</strong>: "You’ve had a few good posts on the best seo blog here and there during 2009, but you need to regularly get back into seriously detached concepts on this page, full-time, once again. Life is too short in this line of work." <strong>Michael</strong>: Thanks, but I've been so busy lately I just don't have time for blogging like I used to. In fact, that new blog I mentioned when I announced my retirement from SEO Theory has now been put on a backburner because the last thing we want to do is start a blog that cannot be kept up-to-date. Not sure how that comment got approved. Thanks for bringing to my attention. I’ve removed it from the blog and reported the spammer.

olmei: “So the real deal is, while expressing your beliefs about what sentiment is NOT… including traditional seo practices like links [cough... wheeze], you seem conveniently as vague as ever, this time round about distinctions within SM Monitoring, as what it IS – MADE of.

We need some theoretical metrics we can use as a base line though Michael. So while I don’t want your algo, if you were 20 years younger and just starting within the online marketing profession, would your experience make you gravitate toward tweeting a bit more, or continue via on-page, including the inevitable Google manipulation we must all CONFORM to?”

Michael: I’m not sure I follow you. Sentiment has nothing to do with where you express your opinion, so were I 20 years younger today I would probably be no more inclined to tweet than I am now. I can praise you or call you a slug through a blog post just as easily as through a tweet (but given how wordy I am, I need a full blog).

olmei: “You’ve had a few good posts on the best seo blog here and there during 2009, but you need to regularly get back into seriously detached concepts on this page, full-time, once again.
Life is too short in this line of work.”

Michael: Thanks, but I’ve been so busy lately I just don’t have time for blogging like I used to. In fact, that new blog I mentioned when I announced my retirement from SEO Theory has now been put on a backburner because the last thing we want to do is start a blog that cannot be kept up-to-date.

]]> By: olmei http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/06/15/why-trureputation-score-measures-sentiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1600 olmei Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:21:00 +0000 http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1581#comment-1600 Since you've closed up SEO Theory I've become almost as bald as you as I search for meaty SEO material; but don't forget to grease the wheels of this sites filtering and start by preventing shit-tite like posts above to continue. The sentiment value I have for you may plummet - unless you pay me to blog :-) OK... So the real deal is, while expressing your beliefs about what sentiment is NOT... including traditional seo practices like links [cough... wheeze], you seem conveniently as vague as ever, this time round about distinctions within SM Monitoring, as what it IS - MADE of. We need some theoretical metrics we can use as a base line though Michael. So while I don't want your algo, if you were 20 years younger and just starting within the online marketing profession, would your experience make you gravitate toward tweeting a bit more, or continue via on-page, including the inevitable Google manipulation we must all CONFORM to? Side note: A few months ago olmei traveled back into the Jurassic period while attempting a dmoz inclusion. I anticipated an ancient response and of course we were rejected the first time around. I then added before the second submission. Organics plummeted for a bit, but on-page is king; even for a crappy site like ours. I wonder what trigger that had, if any. You've had a few good posts on the best seo blog here and there during 2009, but you need to regularly get back into seriously detached concepts on this page, full-time, once again. Life is too short in this line of work. Later Shit-tite Since you’ve closed up SEO Theory I’ve become almost as bald as you as I search for meaty SEO material; but don’t forget to grease the wheels of this sites filtering and start by preventing shit-tite like posts above to continue. The sentiment value I have for you may plummet – unless you pay me to blog :-)

OK…
So the real deal is, while expressing your beliefs about what sentiment is NOT… including traditional seo practices like links [cough... wheeze], you seem conveniently as vague as ever, this time round about distinctions within SM Monitoring, as what it IS – MADE of.

We need some theoretical metrics we can use as a base line though Michael. So while I don’t want your algo, if you were 20 years younger and just starting within the online marketing profession, would your experience make you gravitate toward tweeting a bit more, or continue via on-page, including the inevitable Google manipulation we must all CONFORM to?

Side note:
A few months ago olmei traveled back into the Jurassic period while attempting a dmoz inclusion. I anticipated an ancient response and of course we were rejected the first time around. I then added before the second submission. Organics plummeted for a bit, but on-page is king; even for a crappy site like ours. I wonder what trigger that had, if any.

You’ve had a few good posts on the best seo blog here and there during 2009, but you need to regularly get back into seriously detached concepts on this page, full-time, once again.
Life is too short in this line of work.

Later Shit-tite

]]> By: Michael Martinez http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/06/15/why-trureputation-score-measures-sentiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1591 Michael Martinez Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:59:32 +0000 http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1581#comment-1591 I don't want to give the wrong impression. I'm just leveraging SEO Theory to help get the word out about TruReputation and TruReputation Score. I still don't have time for daily posts. There will undoubtedly be occasional new posts on SEO Theory, though. And not all of them marketing related. I don’t want to give the wrong impression. I’m just leveraging SEO Theory to help get the word out about TruReputation and TruReputation Score. I still don’t have time for daily posts.

There will undoubtedly be occasional new posts on SEO Theory, though. And not all of them marketing related.

]]> By: Gids http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/06/15/why-trureputation-score-measures-sentiment/comment-page-1/#comment-1590 Gids Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:45:02 +0000 http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1581#comment-1590 Good to have you back! Good to have you back!

]]>