<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem With Backlink Checkers And Backlink Analyzers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/03/02/the-problem-with-backlink-and-checkers-backlink-analyzers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/03/02/the-problem-with-backlink-and-checkers-backlink-analyzers/</link>
	<description>Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:55:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seercomp</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/03/02/the-problem-with-backlink-and-checkers-backlink-analyzers/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>seercomp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1484#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article, however long i research this area it seems to get more complex with no one offering a definative answer, meanwhile Companies are running round in circles trying to better their rankings but not knowing whether they are actually degrading their sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article, however long i research this area it seems to get more complex with no one offering a definative answer, meanwhile Companies are running round in circles trying to better their rankings but not knowing whether they are actually degrading their sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/03/02/the-problem-with-backlink-and-checkers-backlink-analyzers/comment-page-1/#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1484#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Thanks.  And, yes, I agree that link sphere contexts have driven a lot of  large sites to the top of search results for tons of topics.  In fact, that will be part of what I have to say in an upcoming article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.  And, yes, I agree that link sphere contexts have driven a lot of  large sites to the top of search results for tons of topics.  In fact, that will be part of what I have to say in an upcoming article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericward</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2009/03/02/the-problem-with-backlink-and-checkers-backlink-analyzers/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>ericward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-theory.com/?p=1484#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>This was art.  Wonderful.  I&#039;ve used every back link checker I can find, stopped. Wrote my own, hated it, re-wrote it, tolerate it.  Now, think of the role LSCs play with massive sites about every subject, like wikipedia or the Library of Congress, compared to small sites about one single subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was art.  Wonderful.  I&#8217;ve used every back link checker I can find, stopped. Wrote my own, hated it, re-wrote it, tolerate it.  Now, think of the role LSCs play with massive sites about every subject, like wikipedia or the Library of Congress, compared to small sites about one single subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
