<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimizing site structures through diverse navigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-theory.com/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/</link>
	<description>Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/comment-page-1/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/#comment-584</guid>
		<description>There is relatively little &quot;universal&quot; navigation on Xenite.Org.  Every page has to link to the home and sitemap pages.  Beyond that, linking requirements depend on the topic and section in which the page is located.

However, I try to build navigational code that looks unified.  I want it to be easy to use.  I&#039;m just assembling navigational sections from reusable modules that were built independently of the system.

I hope that makes sense.  If not, perhaps I didn&#039;t understand your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is relatively little &#8220;universal&#8221; navigation on Xenite.Org.  Every page has to link to the home and sitemap pages.  Beyond that, linking requirements depend on the topic and section in which the page is located.</p>
<p>However, I try to build navigational code that looks unified.  I want it to be easy to use.  I&#8217;m just assembling navigational sections from reusable modules that were built independently of the system.</p>
<p>I hope that makes sense.  If not, perhaps I didn&#8217;t understand your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Can you unpack unified navigation?

The context of this post makes me think you mean universal? As in the same navigational links on every page? 

The navigational structure of Xenite is unified in respect to being a recognizable unit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you unpack unified navigation?</p>
<p>The context of this post makes me think you mean universal? As in the same navigational links on every page? </p>
<p>The navigational structure of Xenite is unified in respect to being a recognizable unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/#comment-582</guid>
		<description>I seriously doubt I&#039;ll ever go for Web 2.0.  As a user I &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;HATE&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; AJAX and Flash and all the other Web 2.0 &quot;features&quot;.  I&#039;m sick and tired of waiting for pages to render.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously doubt I&#8217;ll ever go for Web 2.0.  As a user I <strong><em>HATE</em></strong> AJAX and Flash and all the other Web 2.0 &#8220;features&#8221;.  I&#8217;m sick and tired of waiting for pages to render.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randyray</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>randyray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2008/02/06/optimizing-site-structures-through-diverse-navigation/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>I LIKE the old-shool, less attractive pages on your site. They make Xenite look more sincere and less like a moneymaking engine. Too many websites get &quot;slick&quot; with their appearance while publishing nonsensical content. But even your newer, &quot;more attractive&quot; pages have a different sensibility than most web pages.

Thank goodness you haven&#039;t pursued a &quot;Web 2.0&quot; look yet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LIKE the old-shool, less attractive pages on your site. They make Xenite look more sincere and less like a moneymaking engine. Too many websites get &#8220;slick&#8221; with their appearance while publishing nonsensical content. But even your newer, &#8220;more attractive&#8221; pages have a different sensibility than most web pages.</p>
<p>Thank goodness you haven&#8217;t pursued a &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; look yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
