<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best SEO Theory blog posts of 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/12/17/the-best-seo-theory-blog-posts-of-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/12/17/the-best-seo-theory-blog-posts-of-2007/</link>
	<description>Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:55:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/12/17/the-best-seo-theory-blog-posts-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/12/17/the-best-seo-theory-blog-posts-of-2007/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>I guess it depends on the topic and my schedule.  I sometimes spend 2-4 hours working on a post because I&#039;m interrupted.  I&#039;ve started and set aside and restarted quite a few of them.

If I link out to other resources (something I don&#039;t do very often for this reason) it takes me quite a while to find the exact references I want.  I&#039;ve spent an entire day researching references to link to, only to have to abandon a post because the search engines were no longer indexing content I had once read (which could mean anything about me, the search engines, or the content).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it depends on the topic and my schedule.  I sometimes spend 2-4 hours working on a post because I&#8217;m interrupted.  I&#8217;ve started and set aside and restarted quite a few of them.</p>
<p>If I link out to other resources (something I don&#8217;t do very often for this reason) it takes me quite a while to find the exact references I want.  I&#8217;ve spent an entire day researching references to link to, only to have to abandon a post because the search engines were no longer indexing content I had once read (which could mean anything about me, the search engines, or the content).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinkerbellchime</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/12/17/the-best-seo-theory-blog-posts-of-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>tinkerbellchime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 04:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/12/17/the-best-seo-theory-blog-posts-of-2007/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this information.  I enjoy reading about other people&#039;s stats.  I&#039;m a daily visitor and although I pay special attention to the SEO posts with solid advice on what to do or not do to move up in the SERPS, I&#039;d have to say that the more theory-filled SEO posts are my favorites.  They&#039;re much richer.  It&#039;s tough to write quality posts like you do.  Can I ask how long it takes you on average to write a post.  My guess is about one and a half hours.  Close?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this information.  I enjoy reading about other people&#8217;s stats.  I&#8217;m a daily visitor and although I pay special attention to the SEO posts with solid advice on what to do or not do to move up in the SERPS, I&#8217;d have to say that the more theory-filled SEO posts are my favorites.  They&#8217;re much richer.  It&#8217;s tough to write quality posts like you do.  Can I ask how long it takes you on average to write a post.  My guess is about one and a half hours.  Close?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
