Comments on: Stupid link building ideas for amateurs http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/10/01/stupid-link-building-ideas-for-amateurs/ Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc. Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:35 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: jlhaslip http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/10/01/stupid-link-building-ideas-for-amateurs/comment-page-1/#comment-340 jlhaslip Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:37:54 +0000 http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/stupid-link-building-ideas-for-amateurs/#comment-340 I agree that links are over-rated. The best page I have for google/msn/yahoo search replies has 4 links on it. The site index, w3c validator, w3c css validator and creative commons for the copyright. Not even a menu to the rest of the site. A page I wrote about a year and a half ago and forgot about, but timeless, excellent content. I agree that links are over-rated.
The best page I have for google/msn/yahoo search replies has 4 links on it.
The site index, w3c validator, w3c css validator and creative commons for the copyright.
Not even a menu to the rest of the site.
A page I wrote about a year and a half ago and forgot about, but timeless, excellent content.

]]> By: Michael Martinez http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/10/01/stupid-link-building-ideas-for-amateurs/comment-page-1/#comment-296 Michael Martinez Wed, 03 Oct 2007 03:44:18 +0000 http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/stupid-link-building-ideas-for-amateurs/#comment-296 Content will always be king since that is what search is all about. As for speculations in forums, well, they've always been there. 'Nuff said about the speculations. Content will always be king since that is what search is all about. As for speculations in forums, well, they’ve always been there.

‘Nuff said about the speculations.

]]> By: wibbler http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/10/01/stupid-link-building-ideas-for-amateurs/comment-page-1/#comment-294 wibbler Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:53:01 +0000 http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/10/01/stupid-link-building-ideas-for-amateurs/#comment-294 Links links links - hmmmm. Well - it may be worth noting that as I read around the forums, it looks like google are fiddling with their little knobs again - current speculation indicates that following the latest spate of knob fiddling, a reference to w w w. abcdefwebsite.com on another site in its text without the href, is giving more weight than an inbound link to w w w. abcdefwebsite.com In other words, w w w. abcdefwebsite.com gets a vote from this page. Content must be king? Not sure anymore. Links links links – hmmmm.

Well – it may be worth noting that as I read around the forums, it looks like google are fiddling with their little knobs again – current speculation indicates that following the latest spate of knob fiddling, a reference to w w w. abcdefwebsite.com on another site in its text without the href, is giving more weight than an inbound link to w w w. abcdefwebsite.com

In other words, w w w. abcdefwebsite.com gets a vote from this page.

Content must be king? Not sure anymore.

]]>