<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Quality Links: Help with internal link structure in SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/18/high-quality-links-help-with-internal-link-structure-in-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/18/high-quality-links-help-with-internal-link-structure-in-seo/</link>
	<description>Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:03:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/18/high-quality-links-help-with-internal-link-structure-in-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/07/18/high-quality-links-help-with-internal-link-structure-in-seo/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Hopefully I have now fixed the typo.  Anything else is either intentional or unintentional.  :)

I think any site that uses nofollow for its internal links will algorithmically become invisible.  Basically, it&#039;s &quot;shoot-yourself-in-the-foot SEO&quot;.  A self-inflicted penalty.

And is trust that important?  Yes and no.  We have to earn more than the search engines&#039; trust.  We need to earn everyone&#039;s trust, or as much trust as possible.  I strive to show the value of trust from a larger perspective than just what a search engine algorithm might be evaluating.

And I was not planning to implement an email subscription.  I&#039;ll give it some thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully I have now fixed the typo.  Anything else is either intentional or unintentional.  <img src='http://www.seo-theory.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think any site that uses nofollow for its internal links will algorithmically become invisible.  Basically, it&#8217;s &#8220;shoot-yourself-in-the-foot SEO&#8221;.  A self-inflicted penalty.</p>
<p>And is trust that important?  Yes and no.  We have to earn more than the search engines&#8217; trust.  We need to earn everyone&#8217;s trust, or as much trust as possible.  I strive to show the value of trust from a larger perspective than just what a search engine algorithm might be evaluating.</p>
<p>And I was not planning to implement an email subscription.  I&#8217;ll give it some thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leondz</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/18/high-quality-links-help-with-internal-link-structure-in-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>leondz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/07/18/high-quality-links-help-with-internal-link-structure-in-seo/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I love your debunkings. Another great post. You do have a typo in there though ;)

One quick question - I think I can guess the answer from the spirit of the passage that it relates to - do you think SEs would consider a site that uses nofollow excessively on external links to show a lack of trust? I can&#039;t see them showing any other perception.

Also, is trust really that important? I&#039;m half of a mind that, while there are a handful of really authoritative sites (say determined by something along the lines of HITS), trust is mainly used to identify &quot;bad&quot; sites and devalue them.

By the way, will you be implementing / have you implemented a subscribe by email option for this blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your debunkings. Another great post. You do have a typo in there though <img src='http://www.seo-theory.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One quick question &#8211; I think I can guess the answer from the spirit of the passage that it relates to &#8211; do you think SEs would consider a site that uses nofollow excessively on external links to show a lack of trust? I can&#8217;t see them showing any other perception.</p>
<p>Also, is trust really that important? I&#8217;m half of a mind that, while there are a handful of really authoritative sites (say determined by something along the lines of HITS), trust is mainly used to identify &#8220;bad&#8221; sites and devalue them.</p>
<p>By the way, will you be implementing / have you implemented a subscribe by email option for this blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
