<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crafting Content: SEO, Pizza, and Britney Spears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/04/crafting-content-seo-pizza-and-britney-spears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/04/crafting-content-seo-pizza-and-britney-spears/</link>
	<description>Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/04/crafting-content-seo-pizza-and-britney-spears/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/07/04/crafting-content-seo-pizza-and-britney-spears/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Actually, the transparency of the keywords was supposed to be the illusion.  That is, the whole post was leading up to the punch line: it&#039;s the topic that matters more than the keywords.  I knew I&#039;d grab some secondary combos with the post.  There&#039;s a lot of wide open territory surrounding those keywords (though maybe not for long, now).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the transparency of the keywords was supposed to be the illusion.  That is, the whole post was leading up to the punch line: it&#8217;s the topic that matters more than the keywords.  I knew I&#8217;d grab some secondary combos with the post.  There&#8217;s a lot of wide open territory surrounding those keywords (though maybe not for long, now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdelrio</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/07/04/crafting-content-seo-pizza-and-britney-spears/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>cdelrio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/07/04/crafting-content-seo-pizza-and-britney-spears/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Well done Micheal! You now rank for &quot;seo pizza&quot; and several other combinations of seo, pizza, Britney, and spears.

My question is are you trying to be transparent, or are you are you confident that no sees &quot;the magic&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Micheal! You now rank for &#8220;seo pizza&#8221; and several other combinations of seo, pizza, Britney, and spears.</p>
<p>My question is are you trying to be transparent, or are you are you confident that no sees &#8220;the magic&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
