<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silly myths many SEOs still believe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/05/08/silly-myths-many-seos-still-believe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/05/08/silly-myths-many-seos-still-believe/</link>
	<description>Algorithm analysis, Web community relationship analysis, SEO practices and techniques, industry news, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:48:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-theory.com/2007/05/08/silly-myths-many-seos-still-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2007/05/08/silly-myths-many-seos-still-believe/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>In case you missed it, Matt&#039;s comment on dupe content and supplemental results on SEOmoz&#039; whiteboard friday post:

&quot;I&#039;d agree with most of your video and your bullet points, but lean more toward Michael&#039;s viewpoint on bullet point #2; duplicate content doesn&#039;t make you more likely to have pages in the supplemental index in my experience.&quot;

&quot;It could be a symptom but not a cause, e.g. lots of duplicate content implies lots of pages, and potentially less PageRank for each of those pages. So trying to surface an entire large catalog of pages would mean less PageRank for each page, which could lead to those pages being less likely to be included in our main web index.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, Matt&#8217;s comment on dupe content and supplemental results on SEOmoz&#8217; whiteboard friday post:</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d agree with most of your video and your bullet points, but lean more toward Michael&#8217;s viewpoint on bullet point #2; duplicate content doesn&#8217;t make you more likely to have pages in the supplemental index in my experience.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It could be a symptom but not a cause, e.g. lots of duplicate content implies lots of pages, and potentially less PageRank for each of those pages. So trying to surface an entire large catalog of pages would mean less PageRank for each page, which could lead to those pages being less likely to be included in our main web index.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
